New insights into the phylogeny, systematics and DNA barcoding of Nemertea

Although some clades of ribbon worms (phylum Nemertea) are consistently recovered with high support in molecular phylogenies, the placement and inter-relationships of some taxa have proven problematic. Herein, we performed molecular phylogenetic analyses aimed at resolving these recalcitrant splits, using six loci (nuclear 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, histones H3 and H4, and mitochondrial 16S rRNA and COI) for 133 terminals, with particular emphasis on the problematic families Hubrechtidae and Plectonemertidae. Three different datasets were used for phylogenetic analyses and both maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony methodologies were applied. All but one of the resulting tree topologies agree on the paraphyly of the class Palaeonemertea, whereas Heteronemertea, Hoplonemertea, Polystilifera, Monostilifera and Hubrechtidae are always recovered as reciprocally monophyletic. Hubrechtidae is sister group to Heteronemertea (the Pilidiophora hypothesis) only when length variable regions of 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA are excluded. Moreover, the terrestrial and freshwater family Plectonemertidae is recovered with high support and the implications of this finding are further discussed. Finally, we evaluate the utility of DNA barcoding for specimen identification within Nemertea using an extended dataset containing 394 COI sequences. Results suggest that DNA barcoding may work for Nemertea, insofar as a distinct barcoding gap (the gap between themaximum intraspecific variation and theminimum interspecific divergence)may exist, but its recognition is regularly hampered by low accuracy in species level identifications. Additional keywords: cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, Hubrechtidae, Plectonemertidae, Pilidiophora. Received 6 December 2013, accepted 5 February 2014, published online 30 June 2014